RESUMO
OBJECTIVE@#To analyze the gene mutations of children with juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) and their correlation with clinical characteristics.@*METHODS@#The genetic mutation results and clinical data of 19 children with JMML in Fujian from January 2015 to December 2018 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. According to the results of gene mutation, they were divided into PTPN11 gene mutation group and non-PTPN11 gene mutation group, and the clinical characteristics and prognosis of children with JMML between two groups were compared.@*RESULTS@#Among the 19 children with JMML, 14 cases were male and 5 cases were female, and male/female ratio was 2.8∶1. The median age at diagnosis was 13(3-48) months, and 14 cases (73.68%) were less than 2 years old. Abdominal distension and pyrexia were the common initial symptoms, and all the children with JMML had splenomegaly. The median white blood cell count was 39.82(4.53-103.4)×10@*CONCLUSION@#JMML is more common in male infancy and toddlerhood, and the main gene mutation types are PTPN11 and Ras mutations. Because the JMML children with PTPN11 mutations show particularly rapid disease progression, if there is no timely intervention, most children die in a short period of time. Therefore, early HSCT may improve the prognosis of the children with JMML.
Assuntos
Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Juvenil/genética , Mutação , Prognóstico , Proteína Tirosina Fosfatase não Receptora Tipo 11/genética , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
The use of mini-implants have made a major contribution to orthodontic treatment. Demand has aroused scientific curiosity about implant placement procedures and techniques. However, the reasons for instability have not yet been made totally clear. The aim of this article is to establish a relationship between implant placement technique and mini-implant success rates by means of examining the following hypotheses: 1) Sites of poor alveolar bone and little space between roots lead to inadequate implant placement; 2) Different sites require mini-implants of different sizes! Implant size should respect alveolar bone diameter; 3) Properly determining mini-implant placement site provides ease for implant placement and contributes to stability; 4) The more precise the lancing procedures, the better the implant placement technique; 5) Self-drilling does not mean higher pressures; 6) Knowing where implant placement should end decreases the risk of complications and mini-implant loss.
O uso de mini-implantes trouxe grandes contribuições ao tratamento ortodôntico. Essa demanda gerou curiosidade científica sobre os procedimentos e técnicas de implantação. Entretanto, instabilidades desses dispositivos ocorrem por motivos ainda não totalmente esclarecidos. Objetiva-se, com esse trabalho, relacionar a técnica de implantação com a taxa de sucesso dos mini-implantes por meio das seguintes hipóteses: 1) áreas com osso alveolar pobre e com pouco espaço inter-radicular levam à inadequada implantação; 2) diferentes áreas requerem distintos tamanhos de mini-implantes! O tamanho do implante deve acompanhar o diâmetro do osso alveolar; 3) a correta determinação do local em que será colocado o mini-implante facilita a instalação e contribui para a estabilidade; 4) quanto mais precisa for a lancetagem, melhor será a técnica de implantação; 5) autoperfuração não significa alta pressão; 6) saber onde finalizar a implantação diminui a incidência de complicações e de perda dos mini-implantes.